Differences Differences between Learning Styles (Audio, Visual, Kinesthetic) on Student Math Achievement Class VII SMP 3 Tugu Psychology

Ita, Purnamasari, (2014) Differences Differences between Learning Styles (Audio, Visual, Kinesthetic) on Student Math Achievement Class VII SMP 3 Tugu Psychology. [ Skripsi ]

[img] Text
12. ABSTRAK.docx

Download (20kB)
[img] Text
BAB I.docx

Download (33kB)
[img] Text
BAB II.docx

Download (45kB)
[img] Text
BAB III.docx

Download (75kB)
[img] Text
BAB IV.docx

Download (47kB)
[img] Text
9. Daftar Tabel.docx

Download (17kB)
Official URL: http://repo.iain-tulungagung.ac.id

Abstract

Keywords: Differences, Learning Styles, Learning Achievement The phenomenon of the current study, students feel difficulty in learning mathematics. Mathematics is still considered a boring lesson for students. Even students feel afraid of math teachers, because in the view of the students a math teacher most fierce, boring, and students find it difficult to accept the math. A teacher in giving lessons often using methods that make students sometimes do not understand, and students are required to follow what the teacher. In the process of teaching and learning in mathematics should tetutama both teachers and students mutually enjoyable, especially the student teacher should make the learning process to be fun, effective and efesian. In the study, students have the characteristics or different way of learning known as learning styles. There are students who have learning styles of audio, there is a visual learning style, and those that kinesthetic learning styles. Of the three students 'learning style is audio capabilities through auditory, visual students, abilities through sight, and kinesthetic students by moving or touching .. The problem of this study were 1) What is the difference between the audio with the visual learning style of the students' mathematics learning achievement of class VII SMP 3 Tugu Terri? 2) What is the difference between the visual kinesthetic learning styles to learning mathematics achievement of students of class VII SMP 3 Tugu Terri? 3) What is the difference between the audio with kinesthetic learning styles on the learning achievement of class VII SMP 3 mathematics monument Terri? 4) whether there is a difference between learning styles (audio, visual, kinesthetic) to learn mathematics achievement of students of class VII SMP 3 Monument Terri? .As The objectives of this study were 1) to describe the difference between the audio with the visual learning style terhadapa grade math achievement 3 SMP VII monument Psychology. 2) Describe the difference between the visual kinesthetic learning styles to learning mathematics achievement of students of class VII SMP 3 Tugu Psychology. 3) Describe the difference between the audio with kinesthetic learning styles on students' mathematics learning achievement of class VII SMP 3 Tugu Psychology. 4) To know is there any difference between the styles (learn audio, visual, kinesthetic) to learn mathematics achievement of students of class VIISMP3TuguPsychology. This research is Quantitative Research. This type of research is comparative. Techniques of data collection using questionnaire and documentation. Questionnaire is used to determine the student's learning style and documentation to obtain data on student math achievement semesters 1 and 2. The results showed that. 1) The difference in the average value of mathematics learning achievement of students who have a learning style audio is 79.28 and the average value of mathematics learning achievement of students who have a visual learning style is 81.36. Because the value of the average mathematics achievement of students who have a visual learning style higher mathematics achievement than students who have learning styles of audio, so that students who have a visual learning style better than students who have learning style audio. 2) The difference in the value of the average mathematics achievement of students who have a visual learning style is 81.36 and the average value of mathematics learning achievement of students who have a kinesthetic learning style is 79.31. Because mathematics achievement scores of students who have a visual learning style higher than achievement scores of students who have a kinesthetic learning style, so it can be concluded that the students have a visual learning style better than students who have a kinesthetic learning style. 3) The difference in the average value of mathematics learning achievement of students who have a learning style audio is 79.28 and the average value of mathematics learning achievement of students who have a kinesthetic learning style is 79.31. This is very little different. Because mathematics achievement scores of students who have a kinesthetic learning style is higher than the value of the mathematical achievement of students who have learning styles of audio, so it can be concluded that students who have a kinesthetic learning style better than students who have learning style audio. 4) The difference between learning styles (audio, visual, kinesthetic) to learn mathematics achievement of students of class VII SMP 3 Tugu Psychology. From the analysis of empirical studies of 0.0635 whereas F F theoretical of 3.15 at 5% level and 4.96 at the 1% level. Because the empirical F <F theoretic ie 0.0635 <3.15 and 4.96, then conclude H0 is accepted that there is no difference between learning styles (audio, visual, kinesthetic) to learn mathematics achievement of students of class VII SMP 3 Tugu Psychology. If seen from the average value of learning mathematics achievement, students who have a visual learning style of most high value. So that students who have a visual learning style better.

Item Type: Skripsi
Subjects: Matematika
Divisions: Fakultas Tarbiyah Dan Ilmu Keguruan > Tadris Matematika
Depositing User: Endang Rifngati S.Sos
Date Deposited: 04 May 2015 08:02
Last Modified: 04 May 2015 08:02
URI: http://repo.iain-tulungagung.ac.id/id/eprint/1503

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item